DEVAP://NOTES

Prompt eval loops that survive production traffic

The fastest way to lose trust in an AI feature is to ship prompt updates without a stable evaluation loop. Production traffic reveals edge cases faster than staging data ever will.

A useful loop has three layers:

  1. A tiny offline baseline to detect obvious regressions.
  2. Canary traffic with synthetic and live traces.
  3. A release gate with trend-based thresholds, not single-run snapshots.

This keeps the loop practical enough for weekly releases while still creating a clear stop condition when quality drops.

For agentic workflows, every prompt revision should carry:

  • expected behavior deltas,
  • known failure modes,
  • rollback command,
  • owner for post-release review.

The principle is simple: evaluate for production behavior, not benchmark theater.

Related notes

Additional posts connected to architecture trade-offs, backend reliability, and AI delivery patterns.

Next note

Operating .NET services with AI-assisted architecture reviews

Open next →